Coke Formation over a Nickel Catalyst under Methane Dry Reforming Conditions: Thermodynamic and Kinetic Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CO 2 reforming of methane is studied over a 20 wt % Ni/USY-zeolite, and more specifically, a thermodynamic analysis of the formation of coke is used as a basis for the kinetic modeling of coke phenomena that exist under dry reforming conditions. Two thermodynamic parameters, α and β, are compared to the equilibrium constants for the CH 4 decomposition and the CO disproportionation reactions and defined to determine whether coke formation is favored. This thermodynamic analysis elucidates the significance of the CO disproportionation reaction on the amount of coke deposited over the catalyst under consideration. A kinetic model with negative overall order of one, with respect to the partial pressure of carbon monoxide, is found as the most accurate prediction of the rate of coke formation. This type of kinetics strongly suggests the requirement of three adjacent free catalyst sites for the coking reaction to proceed under allowable thermodynamic conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it