Aperiodic stochastic resonance in a hysteretic population of cardiac neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aperiodic stochastic resonance (ASR) is studied for a densely interconnected population of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that exhibit hysteresis. Switching between states in the presence of noisy external forcing is represented as a "competition between averages" and this is further explained through a semianalytical model. In contrast to energy-based approaches where only the timing of a switch between states is represented, the competition between averages also identifies the input history responsible for a switch. This last point leads to some interesting conclusions regarding cause and effect in the presence of noisy forcing of a hysteretic system. For example, at subthreshold inputs, it is found that the input history causing a switch between states is primarily dependent upon the noise level even though the corresponding time to switch is sensitive to both the distance from the threshold and the noise level. Since the application considered here is to cardiac neuronal control, control performance is considered over the full input range. Noise tuning for adequate control performance is found to be unnecessary if the noise level is high enough. This is consistent with studies of ASR for sensory neurons. Another observation made here that may be of clinical significance is that at higher noise levels, constraints placed upon inputs to ensure adequate control performance are likely to depend upon the switching direction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".