MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981458094 · doi:10.1063/1.1337619

Self-assembling three-dimensional colloidal photonic crystal structure with high crystalline quality

2001· article· en· W1981458094 on OpenAlexaff
Yong‐Hong Ye, François Leblanc, Alain Haché, Vo‐Van Truong

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotonic Crystals and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvaporationCrystallizationMaterials scienceColloidal crystalCrystal (programming language)ColloidMicrostructureCrystal growthPhotonic crystalDeposition (geology)Chemical physicsCrystallographyChemical engineeringComposite materialChemistryOptoelectronicsThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-quality colloidal crystal multilayers were fabricated from aqueous solutions by the vertical deposition method. The effect of the evaporation temperature on the crystalline quality of colloidal crystals was carried out. It is found that with the increase of the evaporation temperature, the colloidal crystal shows an increasing tendency towards equilibrium face-centered-cubic phase, and the resulted sample also shows few dislocations and vacancies when the balance in the processes of nucleus formation, particle transport, and crystallization can be kept. However, with the further increase of the evaporation temperature (above 55 °C), a vast amount of defects appear in the crystal because the fast water evaporation rate, which results in a fast crystal growth rate, will spoil the balance. Optical measurements correspond well to the microstructure results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations234
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicPhotonic Crystals and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207