MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981477223 · doi:10.1021/ja9066404

Deactivation Pathways of an Isolated Green Fluorescent Protein Model Chromophore Studied by Electronic Action Spectroscopy

2009· article· en· W1981477223 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew W. Forbes, Rebecca A. Jockusch

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryChromophoreFluorescencePhotochemistrySpectroscopyQuenching (fluorescence)Green fluorescent proteinIonElectron transferAbsorption spectroscopyPhase (matter)Spectral lineAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Optics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanism of fluorescence and fluorescence quenching of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) is not well-understood. To gain insight into the effect of the surrounding protein on the chromophore buried at its center, the intrinsic electronic absorption and deactivation pathways of a gaseous model chromophore, p-hydroxybenzylidene-2,3-dimethylimidazolone (HBDI) were investigated. No fluorescence from photoactivated gaseous HBDI(-) was detected in the range 480-1100 nm, in line with the ultrafast rate of internal conversion of HBDI(-) in solution. Two different gas-phase deactivation pathways were found: photofragmentation and electron photodetachment. Electronic action spectra for each deactivation pathway were constructed by monitoring the disappearance of HBDI(-) and appearance of product ions as a function of excitation wavelength. The action spectra measured for each pathway are distinct, with electron photodetachment being strongly favored at higher photon energies. The combined (total) gas-phase action spectrum has a band origin at 482.5 nm (23340 cm(-1)) and covers a broad spectral range, 390-510 nm. This extended gas-phase action spectrum exhibits vibronic activity that matches well with the results of previous cold condensed-phase experiments and high-level in vacuo computations, with features evident at +550, +1500, and +2800 cm(-1) with respect to the band origin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations140
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207