Artificial Neural Networks Approximation of Density Dependent Saltwater Intrusion Process in Coastal Aquifers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The flow and transport processes in a coastal aquifer are highly nonlinear, where both the flow and transport processes become density dependent. Therefore, numerical simulation of the saltwater intrusion process in such an aquifer is complex and time consuming. An approximate simulation of those complex flow and transport processes may be very useful, if sufficiently accurate, especially where repetitive simulations of these processes are necessary. A simulation methodology using a trained artificial neural network model (ANN) is developed to approximate the three-dimensional density dependent flow and transport processes in a coastal aquifer. The data required for initially training the ANN model is generated by using a numerical simulation model (FEMWATER). The simulated data consisting of corresponding sets of input and output patterns are used to train a multilayer perceptron using the back-propagation algorithm. The trained ANN predicts the concentration at specified observation locations at different times. The performance of the ANN as a simulator of the density dependent saltwater intrusion process in a coastal aquifer is evaluated using an illustrative study area. These evaluation results show that the ANN technique can be successfully used for approximating the three-dimensional flow and transport processes in coastal aquifers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".