MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981494839 · doi:10.3138/md.2012-0514

Home, Exile, and Unease in Brian Friel’s Globalized Drama since 1990: <i>Molly Sweeney, The Home Place</i>, and <i>Hedda Gabler (after Ibsen)</i>

2013· article· en· W1981494839 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Richard Rankin Russell

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaModernityArtAgency (philosophy)LiteratureIrishArt historyHistorySociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: The Irish playwright Brian Friel has often explored the same dynamic and unique event of place as phenomenologist Edward Casey explored in his writings. In Molly Sweeney (1994), Friel shows how this supposedly “disabled” woman gains agency through creating conversations between the living and the dead and thus populating her mind with a rich community. In The Home Place (2005), Friel elegizes the dislocated landlord Christopher Gore and suggests that Margaret and the local singers are briefly liberated from their poverty while singing Thomas Moore’s music. In his Hedda Gabler (after Ibsen) (2008), Friel affirms the imagination through the emplaced collaboration between Thea Elvsted and George Tesman, a collaboration that will help them recreate Eilert Loevborg’s manuscript (even as Hedda kills herself, representing the death-dance of frenetic modernity). In these plays written during Ireland’s rapid globalization, Friel privileges dynamic, often heterogeneous communities that transcend time, space, and gender through the imagination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.027
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207