Occupation statistics of the 5/7-atom dislocation core structure within n-type indium nitride
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent density functional calculations by Kalesaki et al. [Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 072103 (2011)] and by Takei and Nakayama [J. Cryst. Growth 311, 2767 (2009)] have shown that the 5/7-atom dislocation core structure possesses a donor character within intrinsic wurtzite InN. In the present work, we relax the assumption that wurtzite InN is intrinsic and obtain the occupation statistics of the different possible ionization states of the 5/7-atom dislocation defect sites as a function of the bulk doping concentration. An underlying Gibbs factor formalism, similar to that applied earlier to the problem of obtaining the occupation statistics of the dislocation defect sites within n-type gallium nitride, has been employed for the purposes of the present analysis. The occupation statistics results of this analysis suggest that dislocation line densities below 1010 cm−2 are necessary in order to achieve bulk free electron concentrations lower than 1017 cm−3 within wurtzite InN. Our occupation statistics results are shown to be consistent with existing electron mobility measurements from the literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".