Studies into Abstract Properties of Individuals. VII. Emergence in <i>Hesperostipa comata</i> and Three Species of <i>Achnatherum</i> (Poaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emergence is examined in populations of Hesperostipa comata, and this grass is compared to individuals, populations, and three additional species of Achnatherum. The Achnatherum species are closely related and more distantly related to H. comata. Emergent properties are assessed through measurements of grass spikelets and the divergence from vectors of isometry as expressed in individuals, populations, species, and species groups. Our results demonstrate that the strongest degrees of emergence are expressed at the levels of individuals, species, and groups of species, with the strongest of all being seen when H. comata is compared with the trio of Achnatherum species; populations express the least emergence. This reflects evolutionary differentiation as expressed through the ontogenetic events that led to the formation of spikelets. It can be related to concepts of local and global time; the flow of energy, matter, and information; and the driving force of the expression of novelty (entropy) in organized and historically constrained biological systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".