MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981588480 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0700351104

Single-molecule force spectroscopy reveals a mechanically stable protein fold and the rational tuning of its mechanical stability

2007· article· en· W1981588480 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicForce Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsForce spectroscopyFold (higher-order function)Rational designTopology (electrical circuits)BiophysicsChemistryCrystallographyPhysicsAtomic force microscopyNanotechnologyMaterials scienceBiologyMathematicsMechanical engineeringEngineeringCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is recognized that shear topology of two directly connected force-bearing terminal beta-strands is a common feature among the vast majority of mechanically stable proteins known so far. However, these proteins belong to only two distinct protein folds, Ig-like beta sandwich fold and beta-grasp fold, significantly hindering delineating molecular determinants of mechanical stability and rational tuning of mechanical properties. Here we combine single-molecule atomic force microscopy and steered molecular dynamics simulation to reveal that the de novo designed Top7 fold [Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2003) Science 302:1364-1368] represents a mechanically stable protein fold that is distinct from Ig-like beta sandwich and beta-grasp folds. Although the two force-bearing beta strands of Top7 are not directly connected, Top7 displays significant mechanical stability, demonstrating that the direct connectivity of force-bearing beta strands in shear topology is not mandatory for mechanical stability. This finding broadens our understanding of the design of mechanically stable proteins and expands the protein fold space where mechanically stable proteins can be screened. Moreover, our results revealed a substructure-sliding mechanism for the mechanical unfolding of Top7 and the existence of two possible unfolding pathways with different height of energy barrier. Such insights enabled us to rationally tune the mechanical stability of Top7 by redesigning its mechanical unfolding pathway. Our study demonstrates that computational biology methods (including de novo design) offer great potential for designing proteins of defined topology to achieve significant and tunable mechanical properties in a rational and systematic fashion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it