MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1981589081 · doi:10.1139/p01-030

The contribution of the ozonolysis of terpenes to tropospheric OH concentrations

2001· article· en· W1981589081 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thomas Pfeiffer, O. Forberich, F. J. Comes

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOzonolysisTerpenePhotodissociationOzoneTropospheric ozonePhotochemistryTroposphereChemistryOrganic chemistryEnvironmental chemistryAtmospheric sciencesPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent finding that OH is formed as a direct product of the ozonolysis of terpenes is used to investigate the influence of this new OH source on the tropospheric OH budget applying model calculations. The results show that the OH production following UV photolysis of ozone leads to the main competition for ozonolysis at daytime. OH may increase considerably in its concentration as a result of the ozonolysis of terpenes at low photolysis frequencies, however, at high photolysis frequencies and moderate NOx concentrations this effect is reversed due to the fast reaction of OH with terpenes. At night ozone competes with NO3 in its reactions with the terpenes. Integrated over a full day of 24 h the terpene reactions lead to a source of OH in the troposphere. PACS No.: 82.40We

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→