MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981608088 · doi:10.1021/jf062987f

Detection of Sialylated Phosphorylated κ-Casein Glycomacropeptide Electrophoresed on Polyacrylamide Gels and Cellulose Acetate Strips by the Thiobarbituric Acid and Malachite Green Dye Reactions

2007· article· en· W1981608088 on OpenAlexaff
Takuo Nakano, Noriaki Ikawa, Lech Ozimek

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryChromatographySialic acidPolyacrylamideThiobarbituric acidPolyacrylamide gel electrophoresisSodium dodecyl sulfateBiochemistryCellulose acetateGel electrophoresisCaseinCellulose

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 64 amino acid residue sialylated phosphorylated glycomacropeptide (GMP) from bovine sweet whey can be detected as a Coomassie blue-staining peptide by electrophoresis on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels. There is, however, limited information available concerning detection of GMP as a sialylated phosphorylated compound. Samples of GMP were electrophoresed on SDS-polyacrylamide gels or cellulose acetate strips (CAS). Immediately following electrophoresis, fractions obtained by cutting gels or strips were subjected to sialic acid determination by the thiobarbituric acid reaction and phosphorus determination by the malachite green dye reaction. Both determinations were found to be sensitive enough to detect approximately 20 and 40 microg of GMP in CAS and SDS gels, respectively. Further studies demonstrated that sialylated phosphorylated GMP can be detected on either SDS gels or CAS loaded with whey products or whey-added margarine residues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchFrench-language works237,207