MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981622669 · doi:10.1021/jz100144w

Tuning the Charge-Transfer Property of PbS-Quantum Dot/TiO<sub>2</sub>-Nanobelt Nanohybrids via Quantum Confinement

2010· article· en· W1981622669 on OpenAlexaff
Defa Wang, Haiguang Zhao, Nianqiang Wu, My Alı El Khakani, Dongling Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum dotCharge (physics)NanotechnologyMaterials scienceCarbon quantum dotsProperty (philosophy)QuantumOptoelectronicsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A newly designed photoactive nanohybrid structure based on the combination of near-infrared PbS quantum dots (QDs) as light harvester and one-dimensional TiO 2 nanobelts (NBs) to guide the flow of photogenerated charge carriers is reported. Efficient electron transfer from photoexcited PbS QDs to TiO 2 NBs has been demonstrated to occur in the developed PbS-QD/TiO 2 -NB nanohybrids, and the charge-transfer property can be tuned through the size quantization effect of PbS QDs. Moreover, the use of TiO 2 NBs instead of TiO 2 NPs permits a larger critical size of PbS QDs capable of injecting electrons into TiO 2 NBs, which, in turn, markedly extends the “effective” absorption of the PbS-QD/TiO 2 -NB nanohybrids to a longer wavelength region up to 1400 nm. Such an extension of the “effective” absorption is a major asset for improving the overall photoconversion efficiency of PbS-QD/TiO 2 -NB nanohybrids-based photovoltaic devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations131
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207