MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981626460 · doi:10.1115/omae2002-28582

Effect of Dynamic Behaviour of Piles on Offshore Towers Response

2002· article· en· W1981626460 on OpenAlex
Yasser Mostafa, M. Hesham El Naggar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWave and Wind Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPileTowerRadiation dampingGeotechnical engineeringOffshore wind powerResponse analysisFinite element methodStructural engineeringDissipationFoundation (evidence)Submarine pipelineNonlinear systemEngineeringMarine engineeringGeologyPhysicsWind power

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pile foundations supporting offshore platforms and marine structures are required to resist dynamic lateral loading due to wind and wave forces. The response of a jacket offshore tower is affected by the foundation flexibility and the nonlinear behaviour of the supporting piles. In the present study, the soil resistance to the pile movement is modeled using dynamic p-y curves and t-z curves to account for soil nonlinearity and energy dissipation through radiation damping. The model also allows separation at the pile soil interface. The wave forces on the tower members and the tower response are calculated in the time domain using a finite element package (ASAS). The tower response is calculated with emphasis placed on the effects of dynamic pile-soil interaction on the tower performance and the forces acting on the piles for a range of wave conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWave and Wind Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207