MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981639117 · doi:10.1080/789610162

Tree-ring Analysis of Five Picea Glauca- Dominated Sites from the Interior Boreal Forest in the Shakwak Trench, Yukon Territory, Canada

2005· article· en· W1981639117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. Zalatan, Konrad Gajewski

Bibliographic record

VenuePolar Geography · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaigaBorealDendroclimatologyDendrochronologyPrecipitationPhysical geographyTrenchClimate changeForestryPicea abiesElevation (ballistics)Environmental scienceBlack spruceGeographyClimatologyEcologyGeologyBiologyMeteorologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Five tree-ring chronologies were developed from low-elevation stands of white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) situated in the interior boreal forest of the Shakwak Trench, Yukon Territory. The objective of this study was to investigate the climate impacts on tree growth using trees from within plots located in an interior boreal forest. The five chronologies depict similar trends in tree-ring width, suggesting a significant climatic influence on tree growth. Although the variability and sensitivity of these chronologies is lower than that of treeline sites, low-frequency ring-width variability is remarkably coherent among all the sites used in this study. The relationship between the chronologies and the regional climate data demonstrates that precipitation is more highly correlated with tree-ring width than temperature. This study demonstrates the importance of climate influences on tree growth within sites located in the interior of the boreal forest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolar GeographySame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207