MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981644409 · doi:10.1063/1.1460864

Two shear flow regimes in nematic liquid crystals: Near a charged surface and in the bulk

2002· article· en· W1981644409 on OpenAlexaff
А. В. Захаров, Ronald Y. Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminar flowHomeotropic alignmentLiquid crystalCouette flowMaterials scienceShear flowCondensed matter physicsFlow (mathematics)InstabilityThermotropic crystalMechanicsThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laminar and tumbling flow regimes in a high shear flow, as well as transition from a flow alignment regime to a tumbling situation are investigated in the polar liquid crystal p-n-hexyloxybenzylidenep′-aminobenzonitrile (HBAB) near a charged surface. The relaxation of the alignment angle θ(τ) to its equilibrium θbulk is calculated using the conventional Erickson–Leslie theory for the case of homeotropic alignment of HBAB at a charged indium tin oxide-coated glass plate and for the temperature range in which HBAB exhibits a nematic phase. In accordance with earlier Couette flow experiments, our calculations of the relaxation process for temperatures below 365 K show that the alignment angle is characterized by relaxing to a θbulk of zero value, indicating that the steady laminar flow may break up into a tumbling flow. The nature of the hydrodynamic instability under high shear flow rates is also discussed for HBAB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207