MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981660083 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30458

Differential expression and parent‐of‐origin effect of the <i>5‐HT2A</i> receptor gene C102T polymorphism: Analysis of suicidality in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

2007· article· en· W1981660083 on OpenAlexaff
Vincenzo De Luca, Olga Likhodi, James L. Kennedy, Albert H.C. Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmission disequilibrium testAllelePolymorphism (computer science)Suicidal behaviorGeneticsMedicineBiologyPoison controlGeneHaplotypeSuicide prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor gene has been implicated in the pathogenesis of suicidal behavior by a genetic association between the 5-HT2A C102T silent polymorphism and suicidality in patients with major depression. However, a recent meta-analysis failed to confirm this association. We developed an improved quantitative assay for the measurement of allele-specific expression of the 5-HT2A gene, and find that the ratio of C/T allele expression in the pre-frontal cortex of heterozygous suicide victims (n = 10) was significantly decreased in comparison with the non-suicide group (n = 10) (P = 0.049). Because the 5-HT2A gene is subject to imprinting, the parent-of-origin may affect the inheritance of suicidal behavior. Thus we examined the parental origin of specific alleles for genetic association in a genetic family-based sample of major psychoses in which information on suicidal behavior was available. No association between the 5-HT2A C102T polymorphism and suicidal behavior in major psychoses was detected with the transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.926

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric GeneticsSame topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorFrench-language works237,207