MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981670175 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00042.2002

Developmental regulation of Na<sup>+</sup>/H<sup>+</sup>exchanger expression in fetal and neonatal mice

2002· article· en· W1981670175 on OpenAlexaff
Carmen V. Rieder, Larry Fliegel

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon Transport and Channel Regulation
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbryogenesisGene isoformBiologyFetusSodium–hydrogen antiporterEmbryoInternal medicineMolecular biologyTranscription (linguistics)Green fluorescent proteinEndocrinologyKidneyAndrologyGene expressionTranscription factorCell biologyChemistryGeneSodiumMedicineGeneticsPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the hypothesis that Na(+)/H(+) exchanger expression is regulated during fetal and neonatal development and differentiation. To examine transcriptional regulation of the NHE1 isoform of the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger, transgenic mice were created that contained the mouse NHE1 promoter driving expression of green fluorescent protein. The level of NHE1 transcription varied between tissues and with the stage of embryonic development. The highest expression was in the heart and liver of 12- to 15-day-old mice, and this declined with age. To examine Na(+)/H(+) exchanger protein levels, we immunoblotted mouse tissues from 18-day-old embryos, neonates, and adults. Protein levels increased after embryonic day 18 and peaked at 14 days of age in the heart, lung, liver, kidney, and brain. The greatest rise in NHE1 protein expression occurred in the heart, whereas the smallest increase was in the brain. The results suggest that Na(+)/H(+) exchanger transcription and protein levels are controlled in a tissue-specific and time-dependent manner during development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicIon Transport and Channel RegulationFrench-language works237,207