MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981671332 · doi:10.1111/jch.12425

Effect of Canagliflozin on Blood Pressure and Adverse Events Related to Osmotic Diuresis and Reduced Intravascular Volume in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2014· article· en· W1981671332 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Hypertension · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersJanssen Research and Development
KeywordsMedicineCanagliflozinIntravascular volume statusDiuresisEmpagliflozinBlood pressureDiabetes mellitusType 2 Diabetes MellitusInternal medicineAdverse effectCardiologyEndocrinologyUrologyRenal function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on blood pressure (BP) and osmotic diuresis- and intravascular volume reduction-related adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using pooled data from four placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; N=2313). At baseline, 1332 (57.6%) patients were taking an antihypertensive medication. Canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg provided reductions (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline in systolic BP (SBP) compared with placebo (-4.3 mm Hg [-5.0 to -3.5], -5.0 mm Hg [-5.8 to -4.2], and -0.3 mm Hg [-1.2 to 0.5], respectively) and in diastolic BP (DBP; -2.5 mm Hg [-2.9 to -2.0], -2.4 mm Hg [-2.9 to -1.9], and -0.6 mm Hg [-1.1 to -0.02], respectively). Placebo-subtracted reductions (95% CI) in SBP with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg were -4.0 mm Hg (-5.1 to -2.8) and -4.7 mm Hg (-5.8 to -3.5) and reductions in DBP were -1.9 mm Hg (-2.6 to -1.2) and -1.9 mm Hg (-2.6 to -1.1), respectively. Compared with the overall population, patients with elevated baseline SBP (≥140 mm Hg) had numerically greater absolute SBP reductions (95% CI) with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg and placebo (-12.8 mm Hg [-15.2 to -10.5], -14.2 mm Hg [-16.4 to -12.0], and -6.8 mm Hg [-9.1 to -4.5], respectively). Numerically greater DBP reductions were seen in patients with DBP ≥90 mm Hg at baseline (-5.9 mm Hg [-8.2 to -3.6], -9.0 mm Hg [-11.1 to -6.9], and -7.4 mm Hg [-9.6 to -5.1], respectively). In patients with elevated SBP at baseline, placebo-subtracted reductions (95% CI) in SBP with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg were -6.0 mm Hg (-9.1 to -2.9) and -7.4 mm Hg (-10.4 to -4.4), respectively. Placebo-subtracted changes in DBP were 1.5 mm Hg (-1.6 to 4.5) and -1.6 mm Hg (-4.5 to 1.2), respectively, in those with elevated DBP at baseline. Canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg were associated with increased incidence of osmotic diuresis-related AEs (e.g., pollakiuria [increased urine volume] and polyuria [increased urine frequency]) vs placebo (6.7%, 5.6%, and 0.8%). The incidence of intravascular volume reduction-related AEs (eg, orthostatic hypotension and postural dizziness) was low across groups (1.2%, 1.3%, and 1.1%). In summary, canagliflozin was associated with reduced BP in patients with T2DM across a range of baseline BPs, with increased incidence of AEs related to osmotic diuresis but not intravascular volume reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it