Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette contribution vise à appréhender le phénomène de la francophonie dans les pays du Sud de la Méditerranée. Nous évoquons principalement les aspects politiques de la participation versus la non-participation de ces pays et, accessoirement, leurs aspects linguistiques et socioculturels, dans la mesure où ils peuvent influer, en tant que forces profondes, sur la dynamique politique du phénomène. À cet égard, les éclairages historiques constituent des repères incontournables, comme l’illustrent la « Question d’Orient » et le contexte colonial des XIXe-XXe siècles. C'est ainsi qu'après avoir évoqué la complexité globale de la dimension politique du projet francophone, l’on tentera de cerner les expériences contrastées de quelques pays du Maghreb (Maroc, Algérie, Tunisie) et du Machrek (Liban, Egypte, Syrie) et, au sein de ces deux ensembles, des pays qui y participent et des pays qui n’y participent pas. Nous terminons notre analyse en ébauchant une réflexion sur les aspects psychologiques, sociologiques et linguistiques qui conditionnent un véritable échange culturel entre les partenaires du Nord et du Sud.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".