MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981735931 · doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.585929

Extreme Sea Surge Responses to Climate Variability in Coastal British Columbia, Canada

2011· article· en· W1981735931 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dilumie Abeysirigunawardena, Dan J. Smith, Bill Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Association of American Geographers · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaEnviro Neptune (Canada)University of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTide gaugeClimatologyExtreme value theoryEnvironmental scienceSurgeClimate changeSea levelMagnitude (astronomy)Coastal floodFlooding (psychology)OceanographyGeneralized extreme value distributionStorm surgeSea level riseGeographyGeologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a statistical investigation of the spatial and temporal changes of extreme sea surges in response to climate variability in coastal British Columbia. The study was based on an investigation of in situ hourly tide gauge data spanning the interval from 1950 to 2007 at eleven tide gauges in the region. The characteristics of the recorded extreme sea surges were parametrically modeled by the generalized extreme value distribution while accounting for trends and dependence via climate covariate coefficients. The study confirms that decadal to interdecadal climatic variability is a fundamental element in explaining the changing frequency and intensity of sea surges in coastal British Columbia. For instance, the sea-surge response to climate variability impacts on sites along the British Columbia coast were found to be fairly synchronous with an increase (decrease) in the magnitude of extreme sea surges in response to warm (cold) El Niño/La Niña-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) conditions. These trends make the flooding risks even higher during warm ENSO conditions, especially if the global sea levels continue to rise as predicted by climate models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Association of American GeographersSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207