Protease Expression in Interface Tissues Around Loose Arthroplasties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To determine whether cathepsins and matrix metalloproteinase-1 are involved in accelerating tissue destruction, we examined, immunohistochemically, the expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1 and cathepsins B, D, L, and X in periprosthetic synovial-like interface tissues from 14 patients with failed prosthetic hips and in the synovial membranes of hips from 18 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 25 patients with primary osteoarthritis. The expression levels of all these proteases in the interface tissue were higher than in the synovial membrane of osteoarthritis. The expression levels of cathepsins B and X in the interface tissue were higher than in the rheumatoid synovium. The results show similarities in the expression patterns of cathepsins D and L and matrix metalloproteinase-1 between aseptic prosthetic loosening and rheumatoid arthritis. In addition, these data suggest that the impact of cathepsins B and X on tissue degradation is more pronounced in aseptic prosthetic loosening than in rheumatoid arthritis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".