Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication in Cells Isolated from Urethane-Induced Tumors in A/J Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies using normal or neoplastically transformed established mouse lung epithelial cell lines revealed a reduction in gap junctional, intercellular communication (GJIC) with transformation. To determine the stage in tumor development at which GJIC is interrupted, we used the well-established model of lung tumors induced in strain A/J mice by urethane. In this system, tumor development follows a well-characterized pattern; hyperplasias, adenomas, and carcinomas are manifested at approximately 8, 16, and 40 weeks after urethane treatment, respectively. GJIC levels were examined using a novel technique where cells are grown on a glass slide, half of which is coated with electrically conductive, optically transparent, indium-tin oxide. An electric pulse that opens transient pores on the plasma membrane is applied in the presence of the fluorescent dye, Lucifer yellow, causing dye penetration into cells growing on the conductive part of the slide. Migration of the dye through gap junctions to nonelectroporated cells growing on the nonconductive area is then microscopically observed under fluorescence illumination. Unexpectedly, primary cells cultured from urethane-induced tumors, even late stage carcinomas, possessed extensive GJIC immediately upon isolation. Upon passage for several months however, these cells lost GJIC. These results suggest that the molecular changes that lead to the formation of the tumor in vivo are not sufficient to interrupt gap junctions. Propagation of tumor cells in culture induces additional alterations that can lead to gap junction closure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".