MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1981786398 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-2836

Abstract 2836: Metronomic cyclophosphamide enhances antitumor immune response induced by a DepoVaxTM-based peptide vaccine.

2013· article· en· W1981786398 on OpenAlexaff
Genevieve Weir, Marianne M. Stanford, Neil L. Berinstein, Mohan Karkada, Robert Liwski, Marc Mansour

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversitySunnybrook HospitalImmunovaccine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmune systemELISPOTAdjuvantMedicineIn vivoImmunologyCancer vaccineCytotoxic T cellAntigenVaccinationPharmacologyPeptide vaccineCyclophosphamideEx vivoT cellImmunotherapyInternal medicineBiologyIn vitroChemotherapyEpitopeBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Advanced cancers utilize several mechanisms to escape immune-mediated detection and destruction thus reducing the effectiveness of cancer therapeutics on multiple levels. Low dose cyclophosphamide (CPA) has been investigated as an immune modulator to potentiate active immune response towards tumor cells, but a single bolus injection of CPA has been ineffective at boosting response to cancer vaccines in most clinical trials. We sought to determine if a metronomic regimen of low dose CPA (mCPA) could enhance the efficacy of a peptide-based vaccine formulated in DepoVaxTM (DPX). DPX is a novel vaccine platform comprised of liposomes in oil that is formulated with an adjuvant, universal T-helper peptide and specific tumor peptide antigens. Using a murine tumor model (C3) we tested the benefit of combining mCPA and vaccination for controlling well established subcutaneous solid tumors in vivo. Mice were treated starting 5 days after C3 tumor implantation with mCPA administered in drinking water in a one week on/ off schedule and vaccinated every 3 weeks. In this model, neither mCPA nor vaccine treatments alone were sufficient to eradicate advanced tumors. However, combining mCPA with vaccination provided effective tumor control. Ex vivo analysis of immune response after a single treatment of mCPA combined with vaccine showed a significant increase in antigen-specific IFN-γ release by ELISPOT, which became more pronounced after multiple rounds of treatment in tumor bearing mice. This immune response was accompanied by a corresponding increase in antigen-specific cytotoxic T cell activity as measured by in vivo CTL assay. Dextramer analysis of the antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in the vaccine-draining lymph node revealed that while the total number of CD8+ T cells decreased with mCPA treatment, the number of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells was increased by vaccination and not reduced by mCPA. Flow cytometric analysis of splenocyte cell populations did not show any significant reduction in CD4+CD25hiFoxP3+Treg populations due to mCPA treatment, as previously reported by others, but we did find an increase in myeloid-derived suppressor cells due to mCPA treatment that was decreased in mice treated with both mCPA & vaccination. Finally, adoptive transfer of T cells from tumor bearing mice treated with mCPA & vaccination significantly reduced tumor growth in tumor challenged recipients. Overall, our data indicate that mCPA combines with a peptide based DPX vaccine to enhance the T cell response to antigen that ultimately results in an improved immunotherapy for cancer. The immune-enhancing effects of mCPA in this model are multi-faceted and augment the T cell responses independent of direct cytotoxic effects on the tumor. The results of this pre-clinical study have assisted in the designing of a phase II clinical trial for DPX-Survivac vaccine in combination with mCPA in ovarian cancer patients. Citation Format: Genevieve M. Weir, Marianne M. Stanford, Neil L. Berinstein, Mohan Karkada, Robert S. Liwski, Marc Mansour. Metronomic cyclophosphamide enhances antitumor immune response induced by a DepoVaxTM-based peptide vaccine. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2836. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2836

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→