A Global Prospective On Underwater Munitions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article introduces an issue of the Marine Technology Society Journal focused on the understanding and ongoing exchange of information on underwater munitions. In June 2003, the Canadian Standing Senate Committee for Fisheries and Oceans on Fish Habitat listened to a panel of witnesses urgently request greater federal involvement from entities other than the Department of National Defense in addressing the issue of underwater munitions in both Canadian and international waters. When there was a lack of response from governments, as well as the United Nations, the First International Conference on Chemical and Conventional Munitions convened in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada in October 2007. Over 190 delegates from 14 countries affected by underwater munitions attended the conference and collectively submitted more than 50 papers. The author discusses the history of underwater munitions and explores relationships among international stakeholders which allow them to build on each others' experiences. The increasing awareness of and interest in identification and assessment of potential risks to human health and the environment by underwater munitions is explored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it