Kanairiktok shear zone: the boundary between the Paleoproterozoic Makkovik Province and the Archean Nain Province, Labrador, Canada.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The polyphase Kanairiktok shear zone (KNSZ) separates gneissic rocks of the Archean Nain craton from their reworked equivalents in the Paleoproterozoic Kaipokok domain of the Makkovik Province. In its early stages, the KNSZ bounded the Kaipokok domain as it was thermally softened by 1895-1870 Ma Andean-type magmatism, accompanied by dextral oblique convergence and resultant penetrative deformation. The amphibolite-facies tectonite that developed in this stage was widely overprinted by greenschist-facies mylonite. Laserprobe and spectral 40Ar/39Ar ages of recrystallized and porphyroclastic muscovite, from the greenschist-facies mylonite and from muscovite in a syntectonic quartz vein, bracket the age of deformation between 1740 and 1710 Ma with the best estimate at 1715 Ma. These ages are similar to those of A-type granites within the Makkovik Province and amphibole cooling ages from the province interior. Together with the petrological similarity of the greenschist-facies mylonite to localized low-grade shear zones elsewhere in the Makkovik Province, they are suggestive of a widespread, lithosphere-scale event. The 40Ar/39Ar data do not provide good constraints on the early activity of the KNSZ. However, preservation of relationships between granitoid sheets correlated with the 1895-1870 Ma Island Harbour Bay plutonic suite and early fabrics imply that the granites were emplaced syntectonically in the KNSZ. Thus, the KNSZ was a major, long-lived structure in the Makkovik Province that decoupled events in the reactivated Nain craton from an inert cratonic region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".