Respiratory syncytial virus induces indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase activity: a potential novel role in the development of allergic disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infants that develop severe bronchiolitis due to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are at increased risk of developing asthma later in life. We investigated a potential immunological mechanism for the association between RSV and the development of allergic inflammation. The enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) has been reported to induce selective apoptosis of T helper 1 (Th1) cells and contributed to Th2-biased immune responses. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether RSV infection in vitro could induce IDO expression and bioactivity in human dendritic cells, leading to a Th2-biased immune response. METHODS: Human peripheral blood monocytes from healthy adult donors were isolated, differentiated to dendritic cells (moDC), in vitro. We studied RSV infection and mechanisms of IDO activation in moDC with subsequent effect on T-bet expression. RESULTS: We found that moDC were infected by RSV and that this induced IDO activation. RSV-induced IDO activity was inhibited by palivizumab, UV inactivation, TL4R inhibition, and ribavirin. However, blocking endosomal TLR function with chloroquine did not inhibit IDO activity. Selective inhibitors suggested that RSV-induced IDO activity was dependent on the retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I) related pathway via NF-κB and p38 MAPK. Coculture of RSV-infected moDC with activated T cells, in a transwell system, suppressed expression of T-bet (a Th1-associated factor) but not GATA3 (a Th2 regulator). Inhibition of IDO activity with the competitive inhibitor, 1-methyl tryptophan, blocked the effect on T-bet expression. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our data show for the first time that RSV can induce the expression and bioactivity of IDO in human moDC, in a virus replication-dependant fashion. We suggest that RSV activation of IDO could be a potential mechanism for the development of allergic diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".