MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Intensity, extent and persistence of soil disturbance caused by timber harvesting in jarrah (<i>Eucalyptus marginata</i>) forest on FORESTCHECK monitoring sites

2011· article· en· W1981839220 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Forestry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicForest Biomass Utilization and Management
Canadian institutionsDepartment of Environment and Conservation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoil compactionEnvironmental scienceBulk densityCompactionSoil waterEucalyptusDisturbance (geology)Hydrology (agriculture)Soil scienceEcologyGeologyBiologyGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The intensity and extent of soil compaction caused by timber harvesting was examined in the jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forest of south-west Western Australia. The extent of soil compaction was determined by mapping soil disturbance categories. The intensity of compaction was determined from the bulk density of these disturbance categories. Bulk density of surface soil (0–100 mm) was measured across monitoring grids established for the FORESTCHECK project on eleven harvested sites and seven sites that had never been harvested. Surface soils on sites that had never been harvested had a mean fine earth bulk density of 0.71 g cm−3. Timber harvesting increased the bulk density of surface soils by a mean of 0.15 g cm−3. Compaction was greatest on log landings and primary and secondary extraction tracks where fine earth bulk density was increased by 0.27 g cm−3 compared to never-harvested forest. Compaction on the general harvested area (0.13 g cm−3), which excludes the extraction tracks, was about half that of log landings and extraction tracks. The intensity of soil compaction was consistent with increases observed as a result of timber harvesting in a range of other forests. Although the intensity of harvesting activity and the volume of logs removed is typically greater in gap release than in shelterwood treatments, there was no significant difference in soil compaction between these treatments. Soil compaction did decline as the intensity of individual disturbance activities inside harvested areas declined. Given the potential and demonstrated effects of soil compaction and disturbance on jarrah forest ecosystems, and the potentially long time periods indicated for the amelioration of soil compaction in these forests, ongoing operational management and monitoring of this disturbance is required to limit long-term effects on the productive capacity of jarrah forest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it