MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of off-pump coronary surgery on the mechanics of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall: Comparison with extracorporeal circulation

2002· article· en· W1981840318 on OpenAlexaff
Carl Roosens, Jan Heerman, Filip De Somer, Frank Caes, Yves Van Belleghem, Jan Poelaert

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsOffice of the Chief Medical Examiner
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExtracorporeal circulationIntensive care unitRespiratory physiologyExtracorporealAnesthesiaLungMechanical ventilationCardiologySurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of cardiac surgery with and without extracorporeal circulation on the mechanics of the respiratory system, lung, and chest wall. We also determined the time course of those effects. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study. SETTING: An eight-bed, cardiac-surgical intensive care unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Two groups of patients scheduled for elective coronary bypass surgery were studied: ten patients with extracorporeal circulation and 13 patients without extracorporeal circulation. INTERVENTIONS: Measurement of esophageal pressure after insertion of an esophageal balloon catheter to separate respiratory system mechanics into lung and chest wall components. Measurements were performed preoperatively after induction of anesthesia (control), immediately postoperatively at arrival in the intensive care unit (time 1), and after 3 hrs (time 2). In 12 of the 23 patients, measurements were also performed 6 hrs postoperatively (time 3). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No significant differences concerning demographics or surgical procedure were noticed between the two groups. Respiratory system, chest wall, and lung mechanics were obtained using the technique of rapid airway occlusion during constant-flow inflation. In both the group with and without extracorporeal circulation there was a significant increase in static and dynamic elastance of the respiratory system and lung at times 1 and 2, which tended to decrease again at time 3; chest wall elastance significantly increased at times 2 and 3 in the group without extracorporeal circulation, whereas the increase in chest wall elastance in the group with extracorporeal circulation occurred earlier (also at time 1). Additional resistance of the respiratory system and lung remained unchanged; chest wall resistance, however, significantly increased in both groups. Work of breathing significantly increased in both groups at times 1 and 2. There was a significant reduction in the Pao2/Fio2 ratio in both groups at times 2 and 3. No significant differences between the groups at any moment were noticed. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary bypass surgery with and without extracorporeal circulation results in dramatic impairment of respiratory system mechanics. Based on respiratory system mechanics, early extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting should be performed with caution, no matter whether the off-pump or cardiopulmonary bypass technique is used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207