MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981874829 · doi:10.1108/14630010110811599

Towards customer delight: Added value in public sector corporate real estate

2001· article· en· W1981874829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Corporate Real Estate · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFacilities and Workplace Management
Canadian institutionsPublic Works and Government Services Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic sectorReal estateCorporate Real EstateBusinessContext (archaeology)Public valueProperty managementValue (mathematics)Private sectorMarketingPublic relationsBusiness sectorAdded valueFinanceEconomicsEconomyPolitical scienceEconomic growthComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the findings emerging from the inaugural conference of a new network called the World Wide Workplace Web, an international forum for future real property leaders mainly within public sector real estate organisations. It focuses on the challenges of defining and demonstrating value added in the field of public sector corporate real estate. What is perceived as value added within the public sector CREOs? Is the meaning of added value evolving in the eyes of the customer? How are public sector CREOs partnering with customers to establish value, demonstrate their performance against customer expectations and continuously improve the way business is conducted in light of the feedback received? The paper is applicable to both public and private sectors, but refers frequently to a public sector context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it