MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981875617 · doi:10.3749/canmin.47.2.275

THE CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF THE KORNERUPINE-PRISMATINE SERIES. III. CHEMICAL RELATIONS

2009· article· en· W1981875617 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeries (stratigraphy)Crystal chemistryChemistryGeologyCrystallographyCrystal structurePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The chemical formula of kornerupine sensu lato may be written as X Y 2 M 7 T 4 V O21 W , where X = □, Mg, Fe2+; Y = Mg, Fe2+; M = Al, Mg, Fe2+, Fe3+; T = Si, Al; V = Si, Al, B, Be; W = OH, F. The total number of cations is variable (14.2 to 14.4 apfu ), the sum of the cation charge is 43+, and the amount of vacancy ( pfu ) is given by □ = 15 − ( S 4+ + S 3+ + S 2+), where S Z+ is the sum of the cations of formal charge Z+. The T -site populations are coupled to both B and Fe2+ content; at moderate Si content (~3.71 Si apfu ), the structure accommodates the largest range in B (0–0.9 apfu ) and Fe2+ (0–1.3 apfu ). Flexibility in the kornerupine structure originates at the T (2)– T (3)– T (2) trimer, where coupled expansion–contraction of tetrahedra and rotation [ T (2)] proceed at the expense of sterically induced distortion of the neighboring M (1) and M (4) octahedra. Both Fe2+ and Mg are approximately disordered over M (1) and M (2), with the maximum [ M (1)Fe2+ + M (2)Fe2+] content coupled to the B content of the crystal. The X site shows the greatest affinity for Fe2+, with no apparent coupling of X Fe2+ to the B content. The Al contents of M (2) and M (3) + M (5) are strongly negatively and positively correlated, respectively, with B content. Condensing the general formula to X Y 2 M 7 T 5 O21 W , the principal (heterovalent) end-member compositions for Be-free crystals are as follows: | X | Y | M | T | | W | |:-- | --- | ------ | ----- | --- | - | | □ | Mg2 | Al5Mg2 | Si5 | O21 | F | | □ | Mg2 | Al7 | Si3B2 | O21 | F | | Mg | Mg2 | Al3Mg4 | Si5 | O21 | F | | Mg | Mg2 | Al7 | SiB4 | O21 | F | where Mg = [8,6](Mg,Fe2+), Al = [6](Al,Fe3+), Si = [4]Si, B = [4](Al,B) and F = (OH,F). These compositions can be represented in the orthogonal system X Mg– M Al– T Si, and define a plane on which the compositions of kornerupine can be graphically represented. Chemical exchange involves the two independent substitutions: X □ + M Al2 = X Mg + M Mg2 and M Mg + T Si = M Al + T B. The principal homovalent chemical variations in kornerupine are T Al ⇌ T B and X , M Fe2+ ⇌ X , M Mg. However, neither show a simple 1:1 substitution. For T Al ⇌ T B, the total amount of trivalent cations ( i.e. , T Al + B) varies with variation in the T Al:B ratio (and hence with a change in the Si content). For X , M Fe2+ ⇌ X , M Mg, the total amount of divalent cations ( i.e. , X + M Fe2+ + X + M Mg) varies with the variation in X + M Fe2+ : X + M Mg ratio (and hence with a change in the M Al or X □ content). However, the slopes of ensuing relations are significantly less than 1.0, as these substitutions are constrained by commensurability requirements arising from the layered nature of the structure and the distribution of sites over which these substitutions act.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it