Effect of 2,4-dinitrophenol on the energy metabolism of cattle embryos produced by <i>in vitro</i> fertilization and culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In cattle embryos, the proportion of ATP produced by glycolysis increases following the major activation of the embryonic genome, and development to the blastocyst stage is improved in the presence of 10 microM 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP), an uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation, from Day 5 to Day 7 of culture. In Experiment 1 of the present study, culture of cattle embryos in the presence of 10 microM DNP from Day 5 to Day 7 stimulated development to the blastocyst stage, but had no significant effects on oxygen, pyruvate or glucose uptake, or on lactate production. In Experiment 2, culture of cattle embryos in the presence of 10 microM DNP from Day 5 to Day 7, stimulated the metabolism of [2-14C]pyruvate (a measure of Krebs cycle activity) on all of Days 5, 6 and 7, and stimulated metabolism of [5-3H]glucose (a measure of glycolysis) on Day 7 only. The results show that 10 microM DNP stimulates oxidative and glycolytic metabolism in Day-5 to Day-7 cattle embryos, but this does not fully explain the observed increase in developmental competence. We propose that partial inhibition or uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation may reduce the level of intracellular reactive oxygen species production, thereby facilitating development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".