MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981890973 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-863

Abstract 863: Inhibition of breast cancer metastaticprogression by a novel uPAR targeted monoclonal antibody, ATN-658, correlateswith the uPAR expression.

2013· article· en· W1981890973 on OpenAlexaff
Irawati Kandela, Andrey Ugolkov, Giulio Francia, Shafaat A. Rabbani, Robert S. Kerbel, Andrew P. Mazar

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreConcordia UniversityMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrokinase receptorMedicineCancer researchMetastasisBreast cancerCancerMetastatic breast cancerPathologyTrastuzumabMonoclonal antibodySunitinibTriple-negative breast cancerAntibodyPlasminogen activatorInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has been implicated in the progression of metastatic disease in a number of different solid tumor types including breast cancer. We have developed a therapeutic monoclonal antibody, ATN-658, that targets uPAR in a novel manner. ATN-658 does not inhibit the binding of uPA to uPAR but appears to have pleiotropic effects on other uPAR interactions including those with various integrins. In the present study, we utilized 231LM2-4H2N, a novel highly metastatic variant of the triple negative breast cancer cell line cell line, MDA-MB-231, to evaluate the effect of ATN-658 on metastasis. This variant has been transfected to also express HER2 and metastases in this model are resistant to targeted treatments such as trastuzumab and sunitinib. Orthotopic 231LM2-4H2N xenograft tumor spontaneously metastasizes to lung and liver and forms large macroscopic metastases that lead to death. We transfected 231LM2-4H2N cells with dTomato and Luc2 to allow for real time assessment of metastatic progression using IVIS imaging. Primary orthotopic tumors were staged to 500 mm3, at which time they were resected and the mice followed using bioluminescence to detect metastases, which typically appear in the lungs within 2-3 weeks post-resection. Mice were randomized once lung metastases were visible and treatment was initiated using vehicle control, lapatanib (30 mg/kg QD), ATN-658 (10 mg/kg Q3D) or the combination of lapatanib and ATN-658. Growth of metastases was estimated using average radiance measurements. ATN-658 inhibited metastatic progression by ∼90% and doubled median survival compared to the vehicle control in this study. Lapatanib had no effect on the size of the metastases or survival and the combination of ATN-658+lapatanib inhibited metastatic progression and survival to the same extent as ATN-658 monotherapy. The activation of ERK was significantly inhibited by ATN-658 in vivo although this alone was insufficient to inhibit tumor growth since lapatanib also inhibited ERK to the same extent suggesting the other effects were being mediated by ATN-658. The effect of ATN-658 monotherapy on metastatic tumor growth was much greater in the 231LM2-4H2N model than in the parental MDA-MB-231 model. In order to probe the reason for this difference in effect, we analyzed the expression of uPAR in the various MDA-MB-231 variants. uPAR expression was significantly upregulated in HER2-transfected MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells suggesting that the level of uPAR expression may dictate the degree of response to ATN-658. If this hypothesis can be validated, this would provide a patient enrichment strategy for the humanized version of ATN-658, huATN-658, which is getting ready to go into the clinic. Citation Format: Irawati Kandela, Andrey Ugolkov, Giulio Francia, Shafaat Rabbani, Robert S. Kerbel, Andrew P. Mazar. Inhibition of breast cancer metastaticprogression by a novel uPAR targeted monoclonal antibody, ATN-658, correlateswith the uPAR expression. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 863. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-863

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207