MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981911514 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.015504

Band Structure Approach to Resonant X-Ray Scattering

2001· article· en· W1981911514 on OpenAlexaff
Ilya Elfimov, N. A. Skorikov, В. И. Анисимов, G. A. Sawatzky

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsScatteringResonance (particle physics)Bragg's lawElectronic band structurePoint reflectionAtomic physicsDipoleConduction bandShape resonanceCondensed matter physicsOpticsQuantum mechanicsDiffractionElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the resonance behavior of the forbidden 600 and 222 x-ray Bragg peaks in Ge. These peaks remain forbidden in the resonant dipole scattering approximation, even taking into account the nonlocal nature of the band states. However, they become allowed at resonance if the eigenstates of the unoccupied conduction band involve a hybridization of p-like and d-like atomic states. We show that the energy dependence of the resonant behavior, including the phase of the scattering, is a direct measure of this p-d hybridization and obtain quantitative agreement with experiment. We discuss the implications of this to other materials like V2O3 in which the resonating atom is not at a center of inversion symmetry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207