MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981921935 · doi:10.1039/c5dt00222b

The effect of steric changes on the isoselectivity of dinuclear indium catalysts for lactide polymerization

2015· article· en· W1981921935 on OpenAlexafffund
Kimberly M. Osten, Dinesh C. Aluthge

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsVancouver Biotech (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCatalysisSteric effectsPolymerizationLactideIndiumSelectivityPolymer chemistryDissociation (chemistry)ChemistryLigand (biochemistry)Materials scienceOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of (±)- and (R,R)-tridentate diamino, ortho/para disubstituted phenolate proligands H(NNO(R)) with various phenolate substituents was synthesized and used to prepare indium dichloride complexes (NNO(R))InCl2via salt metathesis of the deprotonated ligands with indium trichloride. These complexes are dinuclear in the solid state, in contrast to previously reported complexes with t-butyl or methyl phenolate substituents. Solution state (1)H and PGSE NMR spectroscopy suggests that a fast exchange between the monomeric and dimeric forms of these complexes may exist in solution and is likely influenced by the chirality of the complexes undergoing aggregation. The indium dichloride complexes were utilized to synthesize dinuclear indium ethoxide complexes via salt metathesis with sodium ethoxide. These complexes were active for the polymerization of lactide. In situ and bulk polymerization data confirmed differences in the activity and selectivity of these systems based on the phenolate substituents as well as the ligand chirality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207