Stochastic Multisite Generation of Daily Precipitation Data Using Spatial Autocorrelation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There are a number of stochastic models that simulate weather data required for various water resources applications in hydrology, agriculture, ecosystem, and climate change studies. However, many of them ignore the dependence between station locations exhibited by the observed meteorological time series. This paper proposes a multisite generation approach of daily precipitation data based on the concept of spatial autocorrelation. This theory refers to spatial dependence between observations with respect to their geographical adjacency. In hydrometeorology, spatial autocorrelation can be computed to describe daily dependence between the weather stations through the use of a spatial weight matrix, which defines the degree of significance of the weather stations surrounding each observation. The methodology is based on the use of the spatial moving average process to generate spatially autocorrelated random numbers that will be used in a stochastic weather generator. The resulting precipitation processes satisfy the daily spatial autocorrelations computed using the observed data. Monthly relationships between the spatial moving average coefficients and daily spatial autocorrelations of the precipitation processes have been developed to find the spatial moving average coefficients that reproduce the observed daily spatial autocorrelations in the synthetic precipitation processes. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed methodology, seven stations in the Peribonca River basin in the Canadian province of Quebec were used. The daily spatial autocorrelations of both precipitation occurrences and amounts were adequately reproduced, as well as the total monthly precipitations, the number of rainy days per month, and the daily precipitation variance. Using appropriate weight matrices, the proposed multisite approach permits one not only to reproduce the spatial autocorrelation of precipitation between the set of stations, but also the interstation correlation of precipitation between each pair of stations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".