MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981930660 · doi:10.3141/2329-01

Water Spray Endurance Test Investigation

2013· article· en· W1981930660 on OpenAlexaff
Scott Koefod, Marc Mario Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHard rimeGlazeIcingChemistryBrineChlorideEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMeteorologyComposite materialMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A modified water spray endurance test (WSET) was adapted from SAE Standard AS5901B and used to study the anti-icing endurance of a variety of sodium chloride–based highway anti-icer liquids. Freezing precipitation immediately forms rime ice on surfaces with no anti-icer treatment. On surfaces treated with anti-icer, freezing precipitation goes through a series of stages and initially forms a liquid brine layer, then nonadherent glaze ice, and finally rime ice. The modified WSET was used to study the effect of a variety of additives in sodium chloride anti-icing liquids. High-molecular-weight organic polymer additives were found to strongly inhibit the onset of rime ice formation. The delay in the onset of rime ice formation caused by anti-icers is postulated to be the result of an enhancement of surface melting, increasing the size of the quasiliquid layer at the ice surface and favoring glaze rather than rime ice formation until the anti-icer has been sufficiently diluted. The same surface melting enhancement caused by anti-icer chemicals may also contribute to the observed effectiveness of low concentrations of anti-icer in preventing ice adhesion to pavement surfaces. In this context, the use of the modified WSET to evaluate rime ice growth rates is discussed as a possible way to compare the relative precipitation resistance (and therefore “effective lifetime”) of different anti-icer formulas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207