Design, optimization, and testing of door-grille silencers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is a common practice to install doors that have openings in them to improve cross airflow through horizontal ventilation. However, excessive outdoor noise and poor noise privacy are known associated issues. Grilles are often installed in these door openings to address this issue. While they may reduce the noise level slightly, they have proven not to be very effective. Effective silencers would be too thick to be installed in doors. This work investigates the design and development of a novel door silencer that reduces the sound transmission to acceptable limits without compromising the airflow. A model of the silencer has been designed and tested—using the Acoustics module of the COMSOL Finite Element software—in a diffuse field environment, and validated with STC ratings. The airflow was modeled using the COMSOL CFD module. The dimensions of the ventilation opening and its position in the door have also been optimized. A real prototype of the model has then been built and its performance tested. Various design guidelines have then been proposed for the design of these doors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".