MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1981989525 · doi:10.1109/mlsp.2010.5588995

Feature extraction via dynamic PCA for epilepsy diagnosis and epileptic seizure detection

2010· article· en· W1981989525 on OpenAlexaff
Shengkun Xie, Anna T. Ławniczak, Yuedong Song, Píetro Lió

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpilepsyFeature extractionComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceEpileptic seizureClassifier (UML)ElectroencephalographyPrincipal component analysisData miningMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feature extraction is an important technique for complex, multivariate data containing various attributes. In this paper, we propose new detection schemes to help diagnosing epilepsy and detecting the onset of epileptic seizures. These schemes are based on the dynamic principle component analysis (PCA) approach and on partially extracted features. We propose a detection performance measure for evaluation of performance of the detection schemes. We also introduce a method for determining the threshold of the PC classifier using the normalized partial energy sequence of the extracted features of the training data set. We use partially extracted features to act as a classifier to help diagnosing epilepsy and detecting the onset of epileptic seizures. A publicly available EEG database is employed to evaluate our detection schemes. Our study shows that the proposed detection schemes are very promising in assisting diagnosis of epilepsy and for epileptic seizure detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207