MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982012694 · doi:10.1002/mrm.1120

Direct reconstruction of non‐Cartesian <i>k</i>‐space data using a nonuniform fast Fourier transform

2001· article· en· W1982012694 on OpenAlexafffund
Gordon E. Sarty, R. Bennett, Robert W. Cox

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Mental HealthMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsKernel (algebra)Fast Fourier transformBessel functionMathematicsConvolution (computer science)Gaussian functionComputationAlgorithmFourier transformIterative reconstructionGaussianMathematical analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhysicsArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An algorithm of Dutt and Rokhlin (SIAM J Sci Comput 1993;14:1368-1383) for the computation of a fast Fourier transform (FFT) of nonuniformly-spaced data samples has been extended to two dimensions for application to MRI image reconstruction. The 2D nonuniform or generalized FFT (GFFT) was applied to the reconstruction of simulated MRI data collected on radially oriented sinusoidal excursions in k-space (ROSE) and spiral k-space trajectories. The GFFT was compared to conventional Kaiser-Bessel kernel convolution regridding reconstruction in terms of image reconstruction quality and speed of computation. Images reconstructed with the GFFT were similar in quality to the Kaiser-Bessel kernel reconstructions for 256(2) pixel image reconstructions, and were more accurate for smaller 64(2) pixel image reconstructions. Close inspection of the GFFT reveals it to be equivalent to a convolution regridding method with a Gaussian kernel. The Gaussian kernel had been dismissed in earlier literature as nonoptimal compared to the Kaiser-Bessel kernel, but a theorem for the GFFT, bounding the approximation error, and the results of the numerical experiments presented here show that this dismissal was based on a nonoptimal selection of Gaussian function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207