MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982019640 · doi:10.2495/ut150141

Solving parking issues: a case study of Abu Dhabi city

2015· article· en· W1982019640 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmoud I. Dibas, A. Al Jassmi, Mostafa M. Ibrahim

Bibliographic record

VenueWIT transactions on the built environment · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Parking Systems Research
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbu dhabiTransport engineeringEnforcementScope (computer science)Environmental planningBusinessLegislationPlan (archaeology)Civil engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abu Dhabi has grown tremendously over a brief period of time. With this rapid growth there are usually growing pains. Knowing that the city would be of significant size and densely populated the road system was constructed with high capacities. Although these considerations were made for the movement of vehicles, it seems that the storage of these same vehicles was not given the same level of consideration. The road system was designed, but early on parking requirements was not enforced.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWIT transactions on the built environmentSame topicSmart Parking Systems ResearchFrench-language works237,207