MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982056889 · doi:10.1159/000244029

Diaphragmatic Activity and Ventilation in Preterm Infants

2009· article· en· W1982056889 on OpenAlexafffund
Francisco J.C. Reis, Donald B. Cates, Leanne V. Landriault, Henrique Rigatto

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsTonic (physiology)Diaphragmatic breathingExpirationVentilation (architecture)MedicineAnesthesiaGestational ageTidal volumeInternal medicineRespiratory systemPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine the effects of inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> and abdominal loading on diaphragmatic electromyography (EMG<sub>di</sub>) and ventilation during sleep, we studied 10 preterm infants (birth weight 1,840 ± 50 g; gestational age 32 ± 0.6 weeks and postnatal age 10.4 ± 1.4 days). We measured surface and esophageal diaphragmatic activity. Ventilation was measured using a nasal flowmeter and a flow-through system. Diaphragmatic activity was analyzed for the duration of total phasic and expiratory activities, the expiratory to total phasic activity ratio and the presence of tonic activity (defined by the presence of electrical activity of the diaphragm at the end of expiration). With 3% CO<sub>2</sub> in quiet and REM sleep, the intensity of EMG<sub>di</sub> increased, but the duration of total phasic activity, the expiratory to total phasic activity ratio and tonic activity did not change. During quiet sleep with 3% CO<sub>2</sub>, ventilation increased (0.392 ± 0.028 to 0.616 ± 0.058 1/ min; p = 0.001) due to an increase in tidal volume and frequency. Similar changes occurred in REM sleep. Abdominal loading with sandbags increased the duration of total phasic activity (0.68–0.78 s; p = 0.03), expiratory phasic activity (0.21–0.32 s; p = 0.01), the expiratory to total phasic activity ratio (0.28–0.39; p = 0.03) and diaphragmatic tonic activity (20–60%; p = 0.04) as measured with surface electrodes in REM sleep. It also increased the expiratory to total phasic activity ratio and tonic activity, as measured with surface electrodes in quiet sleep. Abdominal loading did not alter ventilation or the structure of the average breath in either sleep state. These findings indicate that: (1) in healthy preterm infants, inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> alters EMG<sub>di</sub> and the structure of the average breath in a similar manner: the activity increases but timing and tonus are not changed, and (2) abdominal loading alters the structure of diaphragmatic activity as recorded by surface and esophageal electrodes with a significant increase in expiratory activity and tonus, but it does not alter the structure of the average breath.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207