MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982087204 · doi:10.1002/polb.10580

Raman spectroscopic investigation of the phase behavior and phase transitions in a poly(methyl methacrylate)‐carbon dioxide system

2003· article· en· W1982087204 on OpenAlexaff
Masayoshi Takahashi, Yoshitaka Yamamoto, A. Victoria Nawaby, Y. P. Handa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Foaming and Composites
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyPolymerGravimetric analysisCarbon dioxideSorptionGlass transitionPolymer chemistryMethyl methacrylateKineticsPhase (matter)VitrificationMaterials sciencePlasticizerAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryChemical engineeringPhysical chemistryMonomerOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Laser Raman spectroscopy, in conjunction with an optical high‐pressure cell, was used to investigate the poly(methyl methacrylate)‐carbon dioxide system. The Raman shifts associated with carbon dioxide molecules in the gas phase and those dissolved in the polymer were used to derive sorption kinetics of carbon dioxide and the carbon dioxide‐induced phase changes in the polymer. Measurements were made in the temperature and pressure ranges in which this system is known to exhibit retrograde vitrification behavior. The Raman results on the sorption kinetics and on the onset of plasticization were in agreement with those obtained by gravimetric and calorimetric techniques, respectively. This technique provides a versatile and rapid way of characterizing polymer‐gas systems and information that so far has been obtainable only through painstaking and time‐consuming techniques. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 2214–2217, 2003

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer PhysicsSame topicPolymer Foaming and CompositesFrench-language works237,207