L’ironie romanesque entre l’involontaire et l’échec
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L ’art du roman de Milan Kundera considère Cervantès, Richardson, Diderot, Balzac et plusieurs romanciers du xx e siècle comme de grands novateurs qui ont donné au roman sa forme moderne. En suivant l’argument de Kundera, l’article examine deux genres d’ironie romanesque. Un d’entre eux, visible dans Jacques le fataliste de Diderot, souligne l’impossibilité des personnages de contrôler leur destin. L’autre examine les idéaux poursuivis par les protagonistes et insiste sur leur incapacité de les atteindre. Le destin de Lucien Rubempré dans Illusions perdues de Balzac en fournit un exemple. Le deuxième type d’ironie domine l’oeuvre de Flaubert et, au xx e siècle, acquiert une importance particulière chez Proust, Joyce et Thomas Mann.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it