MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982142249 · doi:10.1353/amp.2015.0009

Reflections from the Beginning

2015· article· en· W1982142249 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kim Martin Long

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican periodicals · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionScholarshipQuarter (Canadian coin)Media studiesHistorySociologyPsychologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reflections from the Beginning Kim Martin Long Acknowledging that American Periodicals is celebrating twenty-five years causes me to reflect back through my career, since the beginning of the journal and RSAP coincide exactly with my beginning as an academic. When I began as a full-time graduate student in the summer of 1990 at the University of North Texas, little did I know that I would have the opportunity to serve as Dr. James T. F. Tanner’s graduate assistant and as the founding managing editor of American Periodicals. I would come to have a significant, or at least an important and functional, role in the founding of the organization and the journal that has become the preferred home for scholars of American periodical literature, now for a quarter of a century. In those early days, I felt somewhat like Melville’s sub-sub-librarian, belonging “to that hopeless, sallow tribe which no wine of this world will ever warm” (that is, a graduate student), in my little workstation in the back of Jim Tanner’s office. Even then, however, I knew that we were doing important and meaningful work. I knew that I had been chosen to be part of something valuable. Jim’s passion for this work inspired me, and I looked forward eagerly to the next task that I was assigned. I do not remember counting hours or punching clocks. I did not feel like hired help. I was afforded an opportunity to participate in the real world of scholarship as a partner. I am still so grateful today for the opportunity. Trying to get a community together in those days was not easy. Now it is a matter of setting up a Facebook page. No Web. No email. I spent days and days, even weeks and weeks, typing department addresses from the MLA Directory and sending letters, asking chairs to forward them to potentially interested faculty. We have a new society! We have a new journal! Get involved! We received letters and phone calls, and we (or at least Jim) hit the pavement, getting a ragtag core of folks together who had an interest in starting something like the Brits’ RSVP. Jim’s contacts, colleagues, and compatriots, like Sam [End Page 8] Riley, Larry Berkove, Ezra Greenspan, Kenneth Price, and Bob Scholnick, were instrumental in becoming a core of scholars willing to write articles or review books for this emerging journal. As I look over that first issue in 1991, I see names and titles, and I feel nostalgic about sitting in that long, narrow office looking at hard-copy manuscripts, typing in text, and reading and re-reading copy, alone and aloud with Jim; about corresponding with the authors, by mail and phone; and about seeing that first issue take shape before my eyes. There was Janice Simon’s article on nineteenth-century periodical covers, Cheryl Bohde’s piece on ideology, and Patricia Marks’s article on theatre. These—along with Larry’s piece on the American canon, Scholnick’s article on Scribner’s Monthly after the war, Price’s piece on Whitman, and Roger Tarr’s work on Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings—rounded out that first issue and demonstrated the range and depth of material ready to be mined from American periodical literature. Sam Riley’s bibliography provided a valuable resource that would continue for some time. Learning so much every day about the wealth of early periodicals on women’s issues and politics, seeing the culture come alive in the pages of well-known magazines such as Scribner’s, being introduced to magazines and newspapers of which I had never heard, and being a close witness to this kind of sophisticated scholarship using primary sources helped me as a new PhD graduate student understand what an academic culture was all about. I got to see how the sausage was made, and it was fascinating. For the first time, I got to know the people behind the pages, and meeting them showed me that I could also enter this world that before had been a mystery. During my three years of full-time doctoral work, I continued to work each day in the American...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican periodicalsSame topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207