MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

North Cascadia Deep Sea Gas Hydrates

2000· article· en· W1982144798 on OpenAlexaffabout
G. D. Spence, R. D. Hyndman, N. Ross Chapman, R. Walia, J. F. Gettrust, R. N. Edwards

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoGeological Survey of CanadaUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyClathrate hydrateSeafloor spreadingAccretionary wedgeGeothermal gradientDrillingPetrologySedimentMineralogyHydrateSeismologyGeophysicsGeomorphologyTectonicsSubduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The Cascadia accretionary margin off Vancouver Island is one of the best studied margins world‐wide for the determination of in situ properties of marine gas hydrates. Most quantitative information has come from cores and downhole logs of the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 146 and from extensive seismic and other geophysical surveys. As part of the ODP site surveys, large‐offset multichannel seismic lines outlined the regional distribution of hydrate, and seismic velocity analyses coupled with full waveform inversion provided estimates of the vertical distribution of hydrate and gas. High resolution single‐channel seismic surveys indicate correlations between hydrate/gas concentrations and topographic highs, and between geothermal flux and topography; these correlations provide insight into fluid and methane flow through the sediments. A deep‐towed multichannel seismic survey (DTAGS), together with other data from 20–600 Hz, provide constraints on gradients at the base of the hydrate and gas layer. Extensive heat flow measurements, from probes and from depths of the bottom simulating reflector (BSR), have been modelled numerically, including the regional effects of sediment thickening and advective fluid flow in the accretionary prism. Other geophysical surveys include several seafloor electrical sounding experiments and seafloor compliance measurements of hydrate. ODP drilling has provided valuable downhole log data, core physical property data, and detailed pore fluid chemistry and isotopes. Several semi‐independent estimates of hydrate and gas concentrations have been obtained; all are dependent on reference sediment properties for which no hydrate and no gas is present. From a vertical seismic profile and other seismic data, the velocity increase in a hydrated region is consistent with hydrate concentrations of 20–30% of the pore space in a 100‐m interval above the BSR. Similar values are determined from log resistivity data and from core pore fluid chlorinity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207