MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982162999 · doi:10.1504/ijmom.2011.041526

A review on the role of activity-based costing information and costs structure integration in supply chain and operations

2011· review· en· W1982162999 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modelling in Operations Management · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicOperations Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActivity-based costingSupply chainScope (computer science)Cost accountingPopularityHierarchySupply chain managementProcess managementCost driverComputer scienceRisk analysis (engineering)Management accountingBusinessOperations researchOperations managementAccountingEngineeringEconomicsMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent times, activity-based costing (ABC) has been evolving to a managerial and cost accounting system rather than a mere cost accounting. The popularity of integration of the ABC in the mathematical models of supply chain management (SCM) for decision support further emphasises the managerial scope of ABC. In this paper, we review the significant role of ABC information and cost structure integration in supply chain mathematical decision support modelling, with the aim of comparing its applicability at different managerial hierarchy levels. The presented literature provides a framework for evaluating the suitability of ABC into different SCM decision making processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.781

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it