MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982172268 · doi:10.1021/ie048761o

Mixing Times in Coaxial Mixers with Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Fluids

2005· article· en· W1982172268 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsImpellerRushton turbineNon-Newtonian fluidNewtonian fluidMechanicsMixing (physics)Shear thinningCoaxialSlip factorTurbinePhysicsAgitatorMaterials scienceThermodynamicsRheologyMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mixing time experiments were performed using a coaxial mixing system consisting of an anchor impeller and three different types of impellers, namely a Rushton turbine, a Rayneri−Sevin impeller, and a new hybrid dispersing impeller. Both co- and counterrotating modes were investigated with Newtonian and shear-thinning fluids. It was found that mixing times were significantly reduced in corotating mode compared to the counterrotating mode or with the only impeller rotating at the same power per unit volume in the transition regimes. Among the various turbine impellers considered, the Rushton turbine was found to be the most effective one in terms of homogenization with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it