MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982175695 · doi:10.1002/adsc.201200676

Unexpected <i>N</i>‐Demethylation of Oxymorphone and Oxycodone <i>N</i>‐Oxides Mediated by the Burgess Reagent: Direct Synthesis of Naltrexone, Naloxone, and Other Antagonists from Oxymorphone

2012· article· en· W1982175695 on OpenAlexafffund
Lukáš Werner, Martina Wernerova, Aleš Machara, Mary Ann A. Endoma‐Arias, Jan Duchek, David R. Adams, D. Phillip Cox, Tomáš Hudlický

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Synthesis & Catalysis · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical synthesis and alkaloids
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsOxymorphoneChemistryNaltrexone(+)-NaloxoneReagentOxycodoneDimethyldioxiraneNarcotic antagonistsIsopropylHydrolysisAntagonistOpiateAlkylationOpioidOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract N ‐Oxides derived from oxycodone and O ‐acyloxymorphone were treated with the Burgess reagent to provide the corresponding oxazolidines in excellent yields. Oxazolidines derived from O ‐acyloxymorphone were further hydrolyzed to noroxymorphone, whose alkylation furnished naltrexone, naloxone, and nalbuphone, which can be converted to nalbuphine, the mixed agonist‐antagonist analgesic. The entire sequence from oxymorphone to the various antagonists was reduced to three one‐pot operations, proceeding in excellent overall yields. In addition, quaternary salts of the oxazolidines with allyl or cyclopropylmethyl groups in fixed equatorial configurations were synthesized. Complete spectral and experimental data are provided for all compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Synthesis & CatalysisSame topicChemical synthesis and alkaloidsFrench-language works237,207