Antiresorptive therapy conserves some periarticular bone and ligament mechanical properties after anterior cruciate ligament disruption in the rabbit knee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess, in an osteoarthritic (OA) model, whether bisphosphonate (BP) antiresorptive therapy altered periarticular bone and bone-ligament biomechanics and OA progression. We surgically transected the anterior cruciate ligament (ACLX) in two groups of rabbits; the first group was dosed with BP (risedronate, 0.01 mg/kg s.c. daily for 6 wk), the second group remained untreated, and a third group of normal (unoperated) control rabbits was also evaluated. We measured distal femoral bone mineral density (BMD, Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry [DEXA]), medial collateral ligament (MCL) laxity, and bone mechanical function (bone cores mechanically tested in compression). These measures were related to cartilage/joint gross morphology, histology, and measures of vascular volume (gelatin-dye perfusion) for evidence of inflammatory angiogenesis and early OA. BMD by DEXA in 6 wk ACLX animals was 18% less than normal controls (p<0.05). In contrast, BP dosing conserved periarticular BMD; risedronate-treated rabbits had distal femoral BMD only 5% less and not significantly different than normal controls. When the same bone cores were compressed to failure, both ACLX and BP-dosed animals were significantly weaker than normal controls (p<0.05). However, the bone energy to failure and elastic modulus of BP-dosed animals was conserved and not significantly different from normal controls 6 wk after ACLX. Blocking bone resorption with BP also resulted in a significantly improved bone-ligament structural complex. MCL-complex laxity was significantly less in BP-dosed animals (1.2 times that of normal controls) compared to untreated ACLX animals (1.7 times that of normal controls; p<0.05). Blocking bone resorption with risedronate did not suppress osteophytosis and inflammatory angiogenesis, which were significantly increased in the periarticular bone of both untreated and BP treated ACLX animals. Thus, administering BP immediately after ACL loss conserved some periarticular bone and MCL-complex properties in an early OA model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".