MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1982199952 · doi:10.1117/12.434401

<title>Towards scalable network emulation</title>

2001· article· en· W1982199952 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Simmonds, Brian Unger

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalabilityComputer scienceEmulationNetwork packetComputer networkNetwork simulationVirtual networkThe InternetInternet ProtocolDistributed computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A network emulator enables real hosts to interact via a virtual network. It combines a real-time network simulator with a mechanism to capture packets from and write packets to a real network. Packets generated by external hosts interact with synthetic traffic within the virtual network, providing a controlled environment for testing real Internet applications. This paper focuses on two aspects related to the scalability of network emulators. The scalability of the virtual network run within the emulator and the scalability of the number of external hosts that can interact via the emulator concurrently. For the scalability of the virtual network, parallel discrete event simulation (PDES) techniques can be employed. The scalability of the number of external hosts requires handling varying amounts of network I/O and mapping packets into the simulator efficiently. These issues are discussed in terms of work being done on the Internet Protocol Traffic and Network Emulator (IP-TNE) developed at the University of Calgary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207